Gulf Coast CHP Application Center
Creating a Community of Enthusiasm for CHP in the Gulf Coast Region
About the Center What is CHP? Markets Regulations News & Events Resource Library
Current Status
Gulf Coast Rubber & Plastics Quick Facts
No. of Gulf Coast CHP sites: 3
% of Gulf Coast CHP sites: 1%
Date of first Gulf Coast CHP site: 1979
Existing Gulf Coast CHP capacity: ~765 MW
% of regional CHP capacity: <1%
Additional regional CHP potential: 3,626 MW

CHP Sites
Nationally, fifteen rubber and plastics sites use combined heat and power.4 In our region, there are three: the Himont USA plant in Lake Charles, Louisiana; the Firestone Tire and Rubber plant in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Bayer Corporation's rubber plant in Sabine Texas.3 These three sites represent approximately 1% of the total number of CHP installations for our region; the first being the Himont plant in 1979.3

For CHP installations listed by state, go to Combined Heat and Power Installation Database.

National Status
CHP capacity
Nationwide, present CHP capacity for this market has been estimated at approximately 765 MW.1,4 This figure accounts for <1% of the total national CHP capacity, assuming a total capacity of 80,905 MW (see chart below).2 The Rubber and Plastics percentage is incorporated into the ‘Other Mfg' pie slice.

National CHP capacity, as of 2004
National CHP capacity, as of 2004.
Source: Hedman, 2005; see also CHP Installation Database - 2006 Status Report, Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc, www.eea-inc.com

National CHP Profile4
  • More than half the sites use natural gas; the remaining use coal, wood, or other fuels.
  • More than half the sites use steam boilers; the remaining use combined cycle systems, reciprocating engines or combustion turbines.
  • Just over half the sites sell excess power to the utilities.
  • Two-thirds of the CHP facilities are owned by third parties, and one-third are self-owned.
Select Case Studies to see how others have implemented CHP.

Regional Status
CHP capacity
In our region as of 2004, the rubber and plastics market had an installed CHP capacity of 221 MW, which represents <1% of the total regional CHP capacity.2 In the chart below the rubber and plastics percentage is again grouped in the ‘Other Mfg.' slice.

Regional CHP capacity, as of 2004
Regional CHP capacity, as of 2004.
Source: Hedman, 2005; see also CHP Installation Database - 2006 Status Report, Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc, www.eea-inc.com

Although CHP has been implemented at only a few Rubber and Plastics sites to date; this pattern does not reflect the true value of CHP to this market. Significant upside potential exists for CHP in this sector - estimated at 4.5 times the capacity already implemented.5 Go to Future Potential for more on this topic.

CHP Profile3
  • Two large (100+ MW) and one moderate capacity system (10 MW)
  • Prime movers are combined cycle and boiler/steam turbine.
  • Prime movers are fueled by natural gas.
  • At least one site, and possible two, sells excess power to the utilities.
References
Energy and Environmental Analysis (April 2004)
An economic assessment of the 2-50 MW combined heat and power market. Evaluations focused on five prime movers, three types of gas turbines and two types of reciprocating engines.
Hedman, B. (2005)
Presentation given at the Gulf Coast CHP Roadmapping Workshop, which reviews the status of existing CHP at the national level, and compares national results with existing CHP in Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas. Technical potential for additional CHP in this three state region is also provided.
Energy and Environmental Analysis (2005)
Database provides information on CHP sites by state, including city, site and organization name, business activity, year of installation, prime mover, fuel type and capacity.
Onsite Sycom Energy (January 2000)
The report describes CHP technologies, CHP current capacity and future technical capacity for the industrial sector in the United States. Also included is a section discussing the factors that fostered or inhibited CHP adoption, along with recommendations to increase CHP implementation in the future.
Onsite Energy (Sept. 2001)
The report identifies the current capacity and remaining technical potential for on-site power generation in the US industrial sector. Results are reported for individual industries, and in some cases for sub sectors within industries. General economic and environmental benefits of CHP are discussed along with CHP-related initiatives for individual industries.
Page Updated/Reviewed: 08/15/2007 11:48 AM